翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Vine staff
・ Vine Street
・ Vine Street (disambiguation)
・ Vine Street (Murray, Utah)
・ Vine Street (Philadelphia)
・ Vine Street (soap opera)
・ Vine Street Bridge
・ Vine Street Expressway Bridge
・ Vine Street Hill Cemetery
・ Vine Street, Cincinnati
・ Vine Street, London
・ Vine sweet mini peppers
・ Vine Toolkit
・ Vine training
・ VINE Transit
Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest
・ Vine Valley Methodist Church
・ Vine ~ Bark & Spore
・ Vine's Expository Dictionary
・ Vine, Indiana
・ Vine, Vojnik
・ Vine, Zagorje ob Savi
・ Vinea
・ Vinea (soft drink)
・ Vinea Summer Camp
・ Vineam Domini
・ Vinebre
・ Vineburg, California
・ Vinec
・ Vinec (Mladá Boleslav District)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest : ウィキペディア英語版
Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest

Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest was a case heard at the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in 2000 and set new case law with regard to the use of wheel clamps by establishing a legal precedent in relation to the concept of consent by expanding upon the decision in the case of Arthur & Another v Anker & Another () 3 AER 783.
==Facts & Initial Hearing==

The case arose out of an incident that had occurred in March 1997 when Ms Vine, the appellant, had parked her car in one of five parking spaces just off High Road, Leytonstone, in east London on land owned by the East London College. At that time the College issued licences to a limited number of people to use these spaces and, in turn, used a service provided by the respondent the London Borough of Waltham Forest to clamp or tow away unauthorised vehicles from them.
On the day in question Ms Vine, who that morning had been undergoing medical treatment at a nearby hospital and had just been informed that she needed an urgent operation, had suddenly felt unwell whilst driving home from the hospital. Unaware that they were on private property she hurriedly parked in one of the five spaces and stepped out and away from her car without seeing the signs warning of the possibility of clamping. She returned only three or four minutes later to discover that her car had been clamped by contractors operating on behalf of the London Borough of Waltham Forest.
The clamp was removed after some fifteen to twenty minutes, once Ms Vine had paid the release fee.
Later that year Ms Vine issued proceedings against the London Borough on the basis that they had wrongfully clamped her car. In their defence they in turn asserted that there was ample signage warning of the clamping of unauthorised vehicles and that their release fee did not represent an unreasonable charge.
The case was heard before the London County Court in May 1998 where the Recorder, though very sympathetic towards Ms Vine, found in favour of the London Borough. He was satisfied there was ample signage warning of the possibility of clamping and that these could have been seen by Ms Vine.
Ms Vine appealed and the matter came before the Court of Appeal on 5 April 2000.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.